Keep an eye out for new designs inspired by gothic art, anime, gaming, D&D and more.
Gothic Candelabra Sticker – Red Candles & Blue Flames
One handmade sticker
Glossy PP with protective laminate · water-resistant · permanent adhesive
Dimensions: see your selected size option.
In stock? Dispatch within 1–3 working days. Delivery time is additional.
A gothic candelabra whose candles are burning a little less normally than expected.
This original sticker features a black four-armed candelabra wrapped in dark red beads and cross ornaments, with deep crimson candles and eerie blue flames. A dark decorative piece for gothic collections, candle lovers, occult-inspired aesthetics and anyone who prefers their lighting slightly suspicious.
Sticker details
- One sticker featuring original Cerebroscope Studio artwork
- Synthetic PP with a glossy protective laminate
- Water-resistant
- Printed, laminated and contour-cut in Germany
Available sizes
- Longest side approximately 6 cm (Medium)
For decorating notebooks, journals, laptops and other smooth surfaces.
Explore Handmade Stickers, Gothic & Horror Stickers.
From the Cerebroscope archive
Z.O.M.B. LABORATORIES
Combustion Analysis 128-R
Object: Four-branch candelabrum
Candles present: 4
Candles burning at intake: 3
Observed flame colour: Blue
Records classification: “Ghost Candelabra”
Classification rejected.
There is currently no evidence of a ghost.
INITIAL OBSERVATION
Blue flame coloration is not intrinsically anomalous.
Flame colour depends upon combustion conditions and chemical composition.
Possible explanations include:
1. fuel composition;
2. wick treatment;
3. metallic salts or other additives;
4. combustion temperature and oxygen availability;
5. contamination;
6. optical effects;
7. deliberate manufacture.
These will be investigated before proposing explanations involving deceased persons.
TEST 1 — AMBIENT CONDITIONS
Air sampled.
No unusual atmospheric composition detected.
Ventilation normal.
Temperature normal.
No significant local airflow sufficient to explain observed behaviour.
TEST 2 — CANDLE MATERIAL
Small wax sample removed from Candle 1.
Separate combustion performed using laboratory equipment.
Flame:
Yellow.
Repeated.
Yellow.
Wax therefore does not independently reproduce the observed blue flame.
Interesting.
TEST 3 — WICK
Wick sample examined.
No obvious metallic impregnation detected during preliminary analysis.
Additional spectroscopy requested.
Replacement wick inserted into sampled wax.
Flame:
Yellow.
Original wick with laboratory paraffin:
Yellow.
Z. OMB — NOTE
Good.
Records:
Good?
Z. OMB:
Yes.
Records:
Because none of your explanations worked?
Z. OMB:
Because several explanations have been eliminated.
A failed hypothesis is useful information.
TEST 6 — CANDLE REMOVAL
Candle 2 removed from candelabrum and extinguished.
After cooling, candle was relit on laboratory bench.
Flame:
Yellow.
Candle extinguished.
Returned to original socket.
Relit.
Flame:
Blue.
Repeated three times.
Same result.
Research priority amended: High.
TEST 9 — POSITION DEPENDENCE
Candles exchanged between sockets.
Result:
Blue flame occurs according to position on candelabrum, not individual candle.
Therefore the candles themselves are unlikely to be responsible.
Candelabrum examined.
No fuel line.
No electrical components.
No detectable heating element.
No obvious chemical reservoir.
Material appears consistent with conventional metal construction.
TEST 12
Inserted standard laboratory candle into Socket 1.
Blue.
Inserted different commercial candle.
Blue.
Inserted improvised cotton wick with paraffin reservoir.
Blue.
Records
Can we call it the Ghost Candelabra now?
Z. OMB
No.
Records
Why not?
Z. OMB
We have established an unexplained combustion phenomenon associated with the object.
We have not established survival of consciousness after biological death.
Those are substantially different claims.
TEST 15 — FOURTH SOCKET
Candle 4 has remained unlit since acquisition.
Attempted ignition.
Wick ignites normally from external flame.
Upon removal of ignition source:
Extinguishes.
Repeated.
Same result.
Candle exchanged.
Same result.
Socket 4 does not sustain combustion.
The other three do.
TEST 18 — THERMAL IMAGING
No relevant temperature anomaly detected within candelabrum body.
TEST 19 — ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY
No unusual result.
TEST 20 — MATERIAL ANALYSIS
Pending.
PRELIMINARY CLASSIFICATION
Candelabrum: Physical object
Flame-position association: Confirmed
Blue combustion: Reproducible
Fourth position unable to sustain flame: Confirmed
Known chemical explanation: Not yet identified
Anomalous: Candidate
Ghost: Unsupported
Records:
What would it take for you to classify it as haunted?
Z. OMB:
Define haunted.
Records:
Oh no.
Z. OMB — FINAL NOTE
The phenomenon is reproducible.
Its mechanism is currently unknown.
These statements are sufficient.
There is no scientific advantage in replacing “unknown” with a more interesting word.
Investigation continuing.
