Fluffy Pink Bat Sticker – Cute Gothic Bat Art

An exceptionally fluffy little bat with absolutely enormous wings.

This original bat sticker features vivid purple fur, a deep pink fluffy chest, huge magenta wings and oversized glossy eyes. Cute, strange and brightly gothic, it combines classic bat features with an almost impossibly round silhouette.

Sticker details

• One sticker featuring original Cerebroscope Studio artwork
• Synthetic PP with a glossy protective laminate
• Water-resistant
• Printed, laminated and contour-cut in Germany

Available sizes

• Longest side approximately 4 cm (Small)
• Longest side approximately 6 cm (Medium)
• Longest side approximately 8 cm (Medium+)

For decorating notebooks, journals, laptops and other smooth surfaces.

Explore Handmade Stickers, Gothic & Horror Stickers, Cute Animal Stickers.

From the Cerebroscope archive

Z.O.M.B. LABORATORIES

Morphological Examination 097-F

Catalogue designation: Fluffy Bat
Preliminary classification: Chiroptera
Sex: Undetermined
Condition: Apparently healthy
Research priority: Moderate

RECEIVING OBSERVATION

Specimen presents with disproportionately large apparent body volume relative to head size.

Wing morphology is broadly consistent with Chiroptera.

Body is approximately spherical while resting.

Initial possibilities:

1. Unusual adipose distribution.
2. Abnormally dense pelage.
3. Postural effect.
4. Combination thereof.
5. Something else.

Records

Could you not just say it's fluffy?

Z. Omb

That is precisely what I am attempting to quantify.

---

EXAMINATION 2 — BODY VOLUME

Palpation indicates that visible body diameter substantially exceeds underlying torso diameter.

No corresponding excessive adipose layer detected.

Conclusion:

Mostly fur.

Records

How much?

Z. Omb

Unknown.

Records

Can we measure it?

Z. Omb

Yes.

---

PROCEDURE 097-F-4

THE FLUFF PROBLEM

Objective:

Determine the relationship between anatomical body volume and apparent body volume produced by pelage.

Non-invasive imaging performed with fur in natural resting configuration.

Approximate torso boundary reconstructed beneath coat.

Difference substantial.

Records

Can we have a percentage?

Z. Omb

Eventually.

Records

Why eventually?

Z. Omb

Because “percentage fluff” is not an established biological measurement.

Records

You started this.

Z. Omb

Yes.

---

OBSERVATION 6 — COMPRESSION

No deliberate compression beyond ordinary handling approved.

Instead, specimen observed during self-grooming and changes in posture.

When fur is naturally compressed against the body, apparent diameter decreases considerably.

When disturbed and subsequently raised—

Records

You scared it?

Z. Omb

No.

Records

How did you make it puff up?

Z. Omb

I did not.

A cardboard tube fell over in the adjacent room.

Records

And?

Z. Omb

Apparent body volume increased.

Records

How much?

Z. Omb

Twenty-three percent relative to the preceding image.

Records

You measured it.

Z. Omb

Obviously.

---

OBSERVATION 9 — FLIGHT

The spherical appearance is primarily a resting-state phenomenon.

During wing extension and flight, the actual torso becomes substantially more apparent.

No obvious impairment of flight caused by pelage.

Wing loading calculations should therefore use estimated anatomical mass and wing area rather than apparent resting silhouette.

Records

So it's just an extremely fluffy bat.

Z. Omb

Current evidence supports that description.

Records

That's what I said on day one.

Z. Omb

You had not measured it.

---

OBSERVATION 14

Specimen entered resting enclosure.

Wrapped wings partially around body.

Fur expanded between folded wing margins.

Resulting shape:

Approximately spherical.

Z. OMB — NOTE

Very efficient thermal geometry.

Further investigation warranted.

Records

You just want to keep measuring the fluff.

Z. Omb

These statements are compatible.

---

FINAL CLASSIFICATION

Order: Chiroptera
Exact species: Unresolved
General health: No abnormalities identified
Apparent spherical morphology: Predominantly pelage
Flight: Functional
Anomalous properties: None established
Research priority: Low

Provisional fluff index: Under revision.

Records

Is “fluff index” scientifically recognized?

Z. Omb

It will be internally reproducible.

Records

That's not what I asked.

Z. Omb

I know.

---

This gives Omb a slightly different kind of scientific ridiculousness: the question is silly, but the methodology isn't. Once Omb decides “how fluffy is this bat?” is a measurable question, they actually have to define what “fluffy” means, decide what variables represent it, create a reproducible measurement and distinguish fur volume from body volume.

Which is, annoyingly, legitimate methodology.