Colour Grunge Portrait Sticker – Gothic Glitch Art

A dramatic black-and-white portrait with long dark hair, diagonal shadow-like stripes and a colourful distressed band across the eyes. Purple backgrounds and pink, orange and yellow glitch details give this original rectangular sticker a bold gothic-grunge look for journals, laptops and alternative art collections.

Sticker details

• One sticker featuring original Cerebroscope Studio artwork
• Synthetic PP with a glossy protective laminate
• Water-resistant
• Printed, laminated and contour-cut in Germany

Available sizes

• Longest side approximately 6 cm (Medium)

For decorating notebooks, journals, laptops and other smooth surfaces.

Explore Handmade Stickers, Gothic & Horror Stickers.

From the Cerebroscope archive

Z.O.M.B. LABORATORIES

Portrait Observation Record 067-C

Catalogue designation: Grunge Art Color
Subject status: Consenting portrait participant
Associated material: Approved colour-treatment portrait
Primary question: Which apparent obstructions belong to the scene, and which were introduced by the image?

Records puts the portrait beside the session photographs.

Records

Something has happened to the eyes.

Z. Omb

In the finished image, yes.

Visitor

That part was deliberate.

The visitor points to the distressed strip crossing the portrait.

Visitor

Keep it.

Records

It is quite difficult to ignore.

Visitor

Good.

The strip contains pink, orange and yellow blocks.

Dark fragments of the eye region remain visible within it.

Its edges break into irregular marks.

Records

Corrupted file?

Z. Omb

Was there a file error?

Visitor

No. I chose that treatment.

Glitch-like appearance: Intentional visual treatment.

Accidental data corruption: Not established.

Records revises the intake note.

Records

It looks broken successfully.

Z. Omb

That is a reasonable account of the intended effect.

The diagonal bands need a different explanation.

In the session photographs, bands of light and shade cross the visitor’s face and shoulder.

With permission, Omb changes the angle of the slatted screen between the lamp and the visitor.

The bands change direction.

They cross hair, skin and the background without following the anatomical boundaries.

Records

So these are not markings on the person.

Z. Omb

Correct. They follow the lighting arrangement.

The finished portrait strengthens their contrast.

It preserves the pattern while changing how prominently it reads.

Visitor

I liked how it cuts across everything.

Omb records that preference.

Records compares the coloured strip with the diagonal bands.

Records

Both interrupt the face.

Z. Omb

Through different processes.

One was present in the photographed scene.

The other was added during the portrait treatment.

Both belong in an accurate description of the final artwork.

Only one was physically projected across the visitor.

Records

We needed the earlier photographs to separate them.

Z. Omb

They make the production history substantially clearer.

The visitor examines a version without the coloured strip.

Records places the finished version beside it.

Records

The eyes are easier to read in this one.

Visitor

Yes. But I prefer the other.

Z. Omb

What changes for you?

Visitor

The colour gives me something to look at before I settle into the face.

Records looks from one image to the other.

Records

I went straight to the bright band.

Z. Omb

Then we have two reported responses. We should not assume every viewer follows the same sequence.

Omb marks a possible later comparison:

Where do viewers look first, and what do they remember afterward?

It remains a research question.

No measured attention pattern is claimed.

The predominantly black-and-white face contrasts with the purple background.

The eye strip introduces several warmer colours into a narrow region.

Records

A lot of colour concentrated in very little space.

Z. Omb

Yes. We could vary its area, saturation and placement separately.

Records

You have turned one stripe into three experiments.

Z. Omb

At least three possible comparisons.

Visitor

You are keeping this version, though.

Z. Omb

Certainly. A comparison study would not replace your approved portrait.

Records reads the catalogue designation again.

Records

Grunge Art Color.

Z. Omb

A style and treatment label.

Records

Not a diagnosis of the visitor’s surroundings.

Visitor

My desk is considerably worse.

Z. Omb

Outside the scope of this record.

The visitor approves the image and its public description.

No unusual property of their eyes, skin or hair is established by the effects in the portrait.

The visual treatment is unusual.

The person does not need to be.

CURRENT RECORD

Subject: Consenting portrait participant
Long dark hair and dark lip styling: Observed
Diagonal bands in the source scene: Produced by the lighting arrangement
Bands are permanent skin markings: No
Contrast strengthened in the finished portrait: Yes
Colourful eye strip: Intentional image treatment
Accidental file corruption: Not established
Eye fragments visible within the strip: Present
Physical band across the visitor’s eyes: Not present in the session
Attention drawn to the colour strip: Reported by two observers
Universal viewing sequence: Not established
Biological anomaly: None demonstrated
Portrait treatment approved: Yes
Research direction: Image construction, contrast and viewer attention

Records adds:

DISTRESSED IMAGE.
UNDISTRESSED PARTICIPANT.

Visitor

That is accurate.

Z. Omb

Keep it.