I Saw It Goth Girl Sticker – Creepy Gothic Character Art

She saw something. Unfortunately, she isn't elaborating.

This original gothic character sticker features a pale woman with voluminous black hair, glowing white eyes, a vivid red pendant and dripping red “I SAW IT” lettering. Dark, eerie and slightly cryptic, it fits horror, gothic and paranormal-inspired collections.

Sticker details

• One sticker featuring original Cerebroscope Studio artwork
• Synthetic PP with a glossy protective laminate
• Water-resistant
• Printed, laminated and contour-cut in Germany

Available sizes

• Longest side approximately 6 cm (Medium)

For decorating notebooks, journals, laptops and other smooth surfaces.

Explore Handmade Stickers, Gothic & Horror Stickers.

From the Cerebroscope archive

Z.O.M.B. LABORATORIES

Ophthalmological Record 100-S

Catalogue designation: I SAW IT
Subject: Adult human
Reason for referral: Unusual ocular appearance
Additional statement supplied by subject: “I saw it.”
Research priority: Undetermined

INITIAL INTERVIEW

Z. Omb: What did you see?

Subject: It.

Z. Omb: What is “it”?

Subject: I don't know.

Z. Omb: Describe it.

Subject: I can't.

Z. Omb: Because you don't remember?

Subject: No.

Z. Omb: Because you lack an appropriate comparison?

Subject: Maybe.

Z. Omb: Can you currently see me?

Subject: Yes.

Pause.

Z. Omb: Good. That question is presently more useful.

---

EXAMINATION 1 — VISION

Subject reports functional vision.

Basic visual testing confirms ability to identify objects, movement, contrast and colour.

No immediate evidence of total blindness.

The externally visible eye does not display ordinary iris or pupil differentiation.

Despite this, the subject demonstrates directed visual attention.

Records

So she can see without pupils.

Z. Omb

She can see while we cannot externally identify pupils.

Those statements are not equivalent.

Records

Right.

---

EXAMINATION 3 — LIGHT RESPONSE

External appearance remains uniformly pale under changes in ambient illumination.

Subject reports ordinary changes in perceived brightness.

No obvious externally visible pupillary constriction.

Question:

How is retinal illumination regulated?

Answer:

Unknown.

---

EXAMINATION 5

Non-invasive imaging approved by subject.

Internal ocular structures are present.

Several correspond broadly to expected human anatomy.

Several do not.

Further interpretation requires comparison.

Records

Does she have a retina?

Z. Omb

Something occupies the anatomical position of a retina.

Records

Does it work like one?

Z. Omb

That is a substantially better question.

---

EXAMINATION 8 — VISUAL FIELD

Subject's visual field exceeds expected human limits in several repeated measurements.

Result initially suspected to reflect testing error.

Protocol repeated.

Result persisted.

Equipment checked.

Control subjects tested normally.

Z. OMB — NOTE

Interesting.

Records

Is this connected to what she saw?

Z. Omb

Unknown.

Records

Could be.

Z. Omb

Many things could be.

That is not sufficient reason to connect them.

---

INTERVIEW 2

Z. Omb: When you said “I saw it,” did the event occur before or after your eyes acquired their present appearance?

Subject: Before.

Z. Omb: How long before?

Subject: Immediately.

Z. Omb: Your eyes changed after the visual event?

Subject: Yes.

Z. Omb: Had this happened previously?

Subject: No.

Z. Omb: Did you experience pain?

Subject: No.

Z. Omb: Loss of consciousness?

Subject: No.

Z. Omb: Loss of vision?

Subject: No.

Z. Omb: Additional visual phenomena afterward?

Subject: Yes.

Z. Omb: Describe them.

Subject: I see more now.

---

Records

Well.

Z. Omb

Yes.

Records

Research priority?

Z. Omb

High.

---

EXAMINATION 12

Subject asked to identify stimuli presented outside conventional expected visual-field boundaries.

Performance significantly above chance.

Testing repeated with randomized presentation.

Effect persists.

No claim regarding mechanism yet justified.

Records

Can she see behind herself?

Z. Omb

No.

Records

Good.

Z. Omb

Why is that good?

Records

I don't know. It just felt like we needed a limit.

---

INTERVIEW 3

Z. Omb: Do you want us to investigate what you originally saw?

Subject: Yes.

Z. Omb: That may require asking you repeatedly about an event you appear uncomfortable discussing.

Subject: I know.

Z. Omb: You may stop the investigation at any point.

Subject: I know.

Z. Omb: Good.

Then we proceed.

---

CURRENT STATUS

Vision: Functional
Externally identifiable iris: Absent or obscured
Externally identifiable pupil: Absent or obscured
Internal ocular anatomy: Altered
Visual field: Expanded
Onset: Immediately following unidentified visual event
Causal relationship: Suspected; not established
Original visual stimulus: Unknown
Subject description: “It”
Anomalous status: Supported
Research priority: High

Primary research question: What changed?

Secondary research question: What did she see?

Order intentional.